Summary–Newspapers Innovate:  An innovative approach to newspapers is being launched in the Czech Republic:  A (very) well-funded group will open cafes linked to the newsrooms of hyperlocal papers (to be published by the group).  Many Europeans like their espresso with their newspaper (and vice versa) so why not?

Yes, we have promised that this blog is not about newspapers, but we cannot help but look for innovations while all around us people are singing dirges.  The New York Times reported that a new venture has launched in the Czech Republic to publish hyperlocal newspapers in four cities and to open associated cafes.  http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/11/technology/internet/11iht-papers.html?8ad&emc=seiab1

PPF Group will soon publish multiple local newspapers on a weekly basis, in addition to multiple websites (can you say “repurpose?”), plus they will open cafes that will be next to—we mean right next to—the newsrooms for these papers.  Literally, the door will be open to the newsroom of each paper.

In addition, visitors will get help on such matters as building their social network profiles or other training on Internet skills.  The entire project will be branded “Nasa Adresa” or “Our Address.”  They may try to scale the model to elsewhere across Europe.

Oh yes, a couple of minor bits of information:  PPF Group has about a gejillion dollars (though they are putting about $13.4m into it).  And, oh yeah, I knew we forgot something:  Google is a major participant, providing the training and, of course, the advertising.  It just so happens that Google is not first in search in the Czech Republic.

So What?

So, it might be a good model.  The cross-platform approach adds the “real world” to demand for news plus Internet access.  It is a recognition that a “Café Society” is an optimal place to create an intersection of social practices.

Then again, its “goodness” as a model may depend largely upon the unusual circumstances there, to wit:

  1. Czech is not spoken by a large number of people, so there is not a lot of space for competition, especially from major players who need large scale;  only those who take localization seriously—e.g., Google—would have a chance.
  2. The Czechs have a kind of “Cafe Society,” which in this case means that they like to sit at the cafe while sipping their latte and reading.  It is like Paris.  However, other European countries are not quite the same:  The Italians named their coffee espresso for a reason.  Most coffeehouses there do not even have chairs (only in the restaurant part of the place).
  3. People in European countries tend to like their newspapers, very much.  The hyperlocal approach, though novel, could be appealing, especially in new democracies, where the local politics are a hot topic.  Think of the broadsheets and pamphlets of London over the centuries.

Summary:  The Second Circuit has headed off confusion from an earlier case and made clear that, at least as far as that circuit is concerned, Google’s use of trademarks in its AdWords program constitute “use in commerce” for purposes of stating a claim.  Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc., 2009 WL 875447

Rightly or wrongly, Google enables users to select as keywords the names of competitors and their products and services.  In a recent case, the Second Circuit has distinguished an earlier opinion (1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. WhenU.com, Inc., 414 F.3d 400 (2d Cir. 2005)) by pointing out that in the earlier case, the use of the trademarks was inside an internal database—in other words, inside the company—while in the Rescuecom case, Google was actively selling these names.  Two such Google programs were at issue:  AdWords and Keyword Suggestion Tool.  In the opinion of the court, these programs fell within the ambit of “use in commerce” necessary for a trademark infringement suit.

So What?

So, now one of the barriers to filing a claim against Google is gone.  Yes, this opinion applies strictly to the Second Circuit, but its opinions are very influential.  So one can expect more such suits.  They are expensive, but they may be worth it.  And one can expect an appeal by Google.